JAN 7 2010

1. Is Obama About to Make a Terrible Nomination in Alabama?
2. Will Prosecutors Soon Have to Answer for Their Misdeeds?

.............................................................................................................
1. Is Obama About to Make a Terrible
Nomination in Alabama?
by Roger Shuler of Legal Schnauzer

Why does Simpson object to Beck? Let us count the ways:

    Mr. Beck works at Capell & Howard, a law firm that represents
    Leura Canary's husband and the Alabama Business Council--
    and is the office used by Karl Rove when he holds meetings in
    Alabama.

    So Beck's firm has ties to Karl Rove. And Simpson is just
    getting warmed up. Beck's actions, or lack thereof, indicate he
    did everything possible to help the government earn a bogus
    conviction in the Siegelman case. Says Simpson:


Mr. Beck is the gentleman who represented Nick Baily and let him be
questioned 70 times and be bullied by Leura Canary's team of
lawyers. And George never saw a conflict here even though his firm
represents Mr. Canary who was causing (the Siegelman case to be
brought).


<source>

............................................................................................................
2. Will Prosecutors Soon Have to Answer for
Their Misdeeds?
by Roger Shuler of Legal Schnauzer

....Now we are left with these big questions: Will that legal notion, the
doctrine of prosecutorial immunity, be overturned completely? And will
it be joined by its ugly cousin, the doctrine of judicial immunity?

Our hope is that the answer to both of these questions proves to be a
resounding yes. We personally have suffered from the evils created
by judicial immunity. And our guess is that the Don Siegelman case
and other Bush-era abuses never would have happened without the
protections offered by prosecutorial immunity.

The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed an Iowa-based case,
Pottawattamie County v. McGhee and Harrington, after the parties
announced they had reached a settlement. The ABA Journal reports
that the county agreed to pay $12 million to settle the case.

<source>

....................................................................................................................................................
__________________________________________________________________________________________

Sponsored by Friends of Don Siegelman  2007
<feedback>________________________________________________________________________________
__________
Enter Get up to speed fast!Find out who Don Siegelman really is.Meet the people who played a role in the prosecution.What can you do to help? Find out here.Get in touch with us.
You need Java to see this applet.
Home page for the Media Archive concerning Don SiegelmanPress and Media before 2008Press 2008Press 2009Last Month's PressThis month's and recent press
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is posted without profit for those who have expressed interest in this
information for research and educational purposes. DonSiegleman.org has no affiliation whatsoever with the originators of these
articles nor is DonSiegleman.org endorsed or sponsored by the originator(s).

"Go to ..." and "more" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as
originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on this site may not match the versions our
readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
.........................................................................
.........................................................................